EV24

Which EV Charging Station to Choose?

Criteria for choosing AC/DC stations, costs, profits, and decisions about payments and hardware.
Krzysztof Bukała
Written by Krzysztof Bukała
Last updated: January 1, 2026
Reading time: 5 min
Revenue generationCPO operatorsIndustry insights
Which EV Charging Station to Choose?

AC or DC - start here

The most important decision is the station type. AC works where drivers have time, while DC is for fast turnover. They differ in investment cost, power requirements, and typical user profile.

CriteriaACDC
Length of stay
LocationsOffices, hotels, residentialHighways, malls, service areas
Investment cost
Power required
Potential turnover

When to choose AC vs DC - quick guide

  • AC: when customers stay longer and do not need fast charging.
  • AC: when grid capacity is limited or budget is low.
  • DC: when the location drives transit traffic and time matters.
  • DC: when you want revenue from high session volume.
  • DC: when you have enough power and space for infrastructure.

5 key criteria for station selection

  1. Traffic and dwell time - estimate how long drivers actually stay.
  2. Grid capacity - without it, DC is rarely viable.
  3. Billing model - can you deploy payments and settlements easily.
  4. Service costs - parts availability and service response time.
  5. Scalability - can the site expand with more points later.

Costs and profits - simplified AC vs DC comparison

ItemACDC
CAPEX
OPEX
Avg. margin per session
Payback speed
Location sensitivity

Payment terminal or not - and alternatives

A terminal increases conversion by reducing friction for drivers without an app. On the other hand, it adds cost and service obligations.

Alternatives:

  • in‑app payments,
  • RFID with consolidated billing,
  • QR code with online payment,
  • BLIK or instant transfer.

In practice, a hybrid model works best: terminals in transit locations, app and QR in sites with repeat customers. Compare terminal cost against revenue lost when drivers have no payment option.

Kiosk terminal for multiple stations

If you have several points in one location, consider a kiosk with a single terminal serving multiple stations. You gain:

  • lower cost per bay,
  • centralized payment handling,
  • easier servicing.

The downside is dependence on one device and the need for clear bay labeling.

Station with display or without

A display improves usability and trust, but adds cost and more service‑sensitive parts. An alternative is app or QR‑based operation.

For security, use rotating QR codes that change periodically to reduce the risk of code tampering.

Local vs international manufacturers - pros and cons

Local

  • pros: faster service, easier communication, shorter supply chain,
  • cons: smaller scale, sometimes fewer advanced features.

International

  • pros: mature technology, broad compatibility, wider model range,
  • cons: longer service times, harder parts availability.

Base the decision on warranty, SLA, and vendor experience with similar rollouts.

Additional criteria often overlooked

  • OCPP compliance and easy integration with the operator system,
  • anti‑tamper protections and station monitoring,
  • enclosure quality and weather resistance,
  • spare parts availability and predictable service costs,
  • ability to expand power or add connectors later.

Summary

Choosing a charging station is not only a hardware decision, but also a business‑model and customer‑experience decision. Start with location profile and real demand, then select station type, payments, and vendor. This usually shortens payback and avoids costly changes after launch.