AC or DC - start here
The most important decision is the station type. AC works where drivers have time, while DC is for fast turnover. They differ in investment cost, power requirements, and typical user profile.
| Criteria | AC | DC |
|---|---|---|
| Length of stay | ||
| Locations | Offices, hotels, residential | Highways, malls, service areas |
| Investment cost | ||
| Power required | ||
| Potential turnover |
When to choose AC vs DC - quick guide
- AC: when customers stay longer and do not need fast charging.
- AC: when grid capacity is limited or budget is low.
- DC: when the location drives transit traffic and time matters.
- DC: when you want revenue from high session volume.
- DC: when you have enough power and space for infrastructure.
5 key criteria for station selection
- Traffic and dwell time - estimate how long drivers actually stay.
- Grid capacity - without it, DC is rarely viable.
- Billing model - can you deploy payments and settlements easily.
- Service costs - parts availability and service response time.
- Scalability - can the site expand with more points later.
Costs and profits - simplified AC vs DC comparison
| Item | AC | DC |
|---|---|---|
| CAPEX | ||
| OPEX | ||
| Avg. margin per session | ||
| Payback speed | ||
| Location sensitivity |
Payment terminal or not - and alternatives
A terminal increases conversion by reducing friction for drivers without an app. On the other hand, it adds cost and service obligations.
Alternatives:
- ināapp payments,
- RFID with consolidated billing,
- QR code with online payment,
- BLIK or instant transfer.
In practice, a hybrid model works best: terminals in transit locations, app and QR in sites with repeat customers. Compare terminal cost against revenue lost when drivers have no payment option.
Kiosk terminal for multiple stations
If you have several points in one location, consider a kiosk with a single terminal serving multiple stations. You gain:
- lower cost per bay,
- centralized payment handling,
- easier servicing.
The downside is dependence on one device and the need for clear bay labeling.
Station with display or without
A display improves usability and trust, but adds cost and more serviceāsensitive parts. An alternative is app or QRābased operation.
For security, use rotating QR codes that change periodically to reduce the risk of code tampering.
Local vs international manufacturers - pros and cons
Local
- pros: faster service, easier communication, shorter supply chain,
- cons: smaller scale, sometimes fewer advanced features.
International
- pros: mature technology, broad compatibility, wider model range,
- cons: longer service times, harder parts availability.
Base the decision on warranty, SLA, and vendor experience with similar rollouts.
Additional criteria often overlooked
- OCPP compliance and easy integration with the operator system,
- antiātamper protections and station monitoring,
- enclosure quality and weather resistance,
- spare parts availability and predictable service costs,
- ability to expand power or add connectors later.
Summary
Choosing a charging station is not only a hardware decision, but also a businessāmodel and customerāexperience decision. Start with location profile and real demand, then select station type, payments, and vendor. This usually shortens payback and avoids costly changes after launch.
